Get in Touch

Government country reports — such as US State Department human rights reports, UK Home Office CPIN files, or EUAA country-of-origin dossiers — often lag behind on-the-ground conditions and rarely address individualized, intersectional risk. An independent expert report supplies current, primary-source analysis of specific vulnerabilities: digital footprint exposure, family-linked Amn-e-Melli profiling, Revolutionary Court summons patterns, and localized enforcement that generic state papers systematically miss.

Every report is structured to the recipient court's evidentiary code. For US EOIR proceedings, reports satisfy Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert reliability benchmarks. For UK tribunals, they incorporate formal declarations under FPR Part 25 and Practice Direction 25B, affirming the expert's overriding duty to the tribunal. Canada IRB, Australia AAT, EU member-state, and other global tribunal formats are mapped during secure intake.

We prepare evidence for asylum and human rights proceedings worldwide — including US EOIR immigration courts, UK First-tier and Upper Tribunals, Canada IRB/RAD/RPD, Australian AAT, EU member-state administrative courts under ECHR frameworks, and other international tribunals. Specify your destination jurisdiction and evidentiary standard on the evidence brief form and we align scope, formatting, and citation methodology accordingly.

State cyber-surveillance capacity is a frequent dimension in Woman, Life, Freedom and political dissent claims. Our digital footprint audits evaluate whether VAJA, FATA, or affiliated apparatuses can link Telegram, Instagram, VPN usage, or other platform activity to identifiable individuals — including SIM registration, ISP cooperation, and metadata retention practices — using primary-source and technical OSINT methodology.

Provide the target jurisdiction and proceeding type, hearing or report deadline, claimant risk verticals (political, religious, LGBTQ+, digital surveillance, etc.), languages spoken, disputed state country evidence (if any), and a concise case brief outlining the Iranian-specific nexus. Bar number or firm details help us allocate the appropriate researcher. All intake is handled via encrypted channels.

Standard country condition reports are typically delivered within agreed scope after intake confirmation and fee alignment. Express, urgent, and emergency tiers are available for imminent hearing dates — specify your deadline on the evidence brief form and we will confirm feasibility before drafting begins. We do not commence work without transparent, agreed scope.

We verify summons authenticity against Farsi-language primary sources, assess procedural context within Iran's dual judicial system (general vs Revolutionary Courts), and evaluate whether documented state interest translates to a well-founded fear of persecution on return. Family-linked security profiling (Amn-e-Melli) and conscription or border-crossing consequences for failed asylum returnees are modeled where relevant.

All briefs and case materials are processed within strict data-protection firewalls. Contact data is never used for marketing or shared with government agencies. Custom NDAs can be executed on request. For appellants contacting us directly, we explain how to involve legal counsel and never disclose information without explicit authorization.